Melroch @ Random

27 March, 2009

How Burgundy became Borgonze, part one

Filed under: Alternate history, Borgonze, Lucus — Tags: , , — melroch @ 13:45

There were dynastic troubles for both and in the early 14th century, but there was one important difference: Lucally there was no rule of priestly celibate in the western churches. Rather the rule was like in the OTL Orthodox churches: if a priest wanted to marry he had to do so before he got ordained. In the Gaulish churches even bishops could be married, and although bishoprics formally could not be inherited — bishops were elected by a college of presbyters and metropolites and patriarchs were elected by a college of bishops — in practice bishoprics were often conferred on a son or nephew of the previous bishop, especially if the bishop was also the secular ruler of his diocese. The most notable such prince-bishopric was Proence.

Thus Herrig Dieophí, bishop of Meç (OTL Henri Dauphin, bishop of Metz) was married to Mary, daughter of Duke Robert II of . Just as OTL Guighe de Vienay died young and childless and was succeded by his brother Hombert II of Vienay. Hombert was incompetent and uninterested in government and left it to his uncle, bishop Herrig, and when Herrig died in 1349 the likewise childless Hombert abdicated in favor of Herrig’s (unordained) second son, also named Guighe (1320-1386), and when Philip I of died of the plague in 1361 Guighe IX of also became Guighe I of . Guighe realized that the war over the succession to the throne of France, raging between the houses of , Normandy and Valois could not be won as long as it was an all on all war with three parties.

(more…)

Rhodrese articles and indefinite pronouns

Filed under: Conlanging — Tags: , , , — melroch @ 12:23

Some while ago I had to change my mind on the shape of the plural definite article in Rhodrese. Ever since the inception of the lang I’d thought the plural definite article was il, but with the rule that unstressed e and unstressed i are pronounced alike as [ɪ] a plural il would be homophonous with the masculine el, and I can clearly not have that! Better then to have the plural article as li, with the prepositions + article contractions becoming dilli, alli, polli etc. Needless to say the plural article before words beginning in a vowel remains gl’.

This also offers a clue to the demise of distinct feminine forms, for surely the feminine plural article was originally le but became homophonous with the masculine li. The abolition of le was surely one of Bernual’s reforms.

(more…)

Actually starting to post Melroch@Random

Filed under: Admin — melroch @ 12:00

I have decided to actually start posting all my random notes, thoughts and jottings to my blog Melroch@Random, to have a record of them in one place where both I myself and others can review them and comment on them.

There will inevitably be crossposting between the blog and various mailing lists, but I promise to keep crossposting between mailing lists to a minimum. Now those who want to know whant I’m up to when they haven’t heard from me onlist for a while know where to go! :-)

Powered by WordPress

Register Login