<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Melroch @ Random &#187; philology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.melroch.se/tag/philology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.melroch.se</link>
	<description>Random ideas and thoughts of Benct Philip Jonsson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Philological near-omniscience</title>
		<link>http://blog.melroch.se/alternate-history/re-romconlang-northern-romance-chronology-and-phonology/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.melroch.se/alternate-history/re-romconlang-northern-romance-chronology-and-phonology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>melroch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternate history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.melroch.se/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Romconlang Peter Collier wrote:


  Once more I find myeself torn, BP,  between awe at your philological
  near-omniscience, and despair as yet again I find myself reconsidering
  linguistic points I thought I had firmly pinned down&#8230;.
  
  Trying to sort even the bare bones of this language is like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/romconlang/">Romconlang</a> Peter Collier wrote:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Once more I find myeself torn, BP,  between awe at your philological
  near-omniscience, and despair as yet again I find myself reconsidering
  linguistic points I thought I had firmly pinned down&#8230;.</p>
  
  <p>Trying to sort even the bare bones of this language is like trying to herd
  cats.</p>
  
  <p>P</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I sure hope I haven&#8217;t achieved even near philological omniscience. For
one thing the leading passion of my life would be spent already in
mid-life, and for the other I know best how many books I&#8217;ve read only
cursorily or not at all &#8212; I do hope they were not written in vain!</p>

<p><span id="more-29"></span></p>

<p>I&#8217;m sure I can come across as a nitpicky bore &#8212; or even boor I&#8217;m
afraid. I have no right, of course to hold others playing the game to
the same rules of perhaps excessive naturalism as I hold myself to. To
me the laws of linguistic universals and phonetic plausibility in a
sense <em>are</em> the rules of the game of altlanging, and perhaps the point
of the game to me is to explore the limits of those laws in a way that
mere observation of their operation in real life cannot afford. I once
said that I wouldn&#8217;t accept a hypothetical prehistoric linguistic
change which didn&#8217;t have an attested parallel in the known history of
some language, but as a rule for artistic development that might well
be too limiting.</p>

<p>To other artlangers aesthetic expression, be it euphony or cacophony,
is the only principle, and that is of course their prerogative. What
to me is plain dadaism or even stale formalism may to its creator be
the height of whatever they are out to express, and if so more power
to them of course!</p>

<p>When people develop a game together they must of course all have a say
over the rules, and it is natural that at times there is disagreement.
As soccer developed they came to the realization that it was a good
idea not to have trees and bushes growing on the field, but some found
the no hands rule too restrictive, and so rugby parted company. If my
rules don&#8217;t fit your lang you should by all means say so!</p>

<p><em>BP</em></p>
	Tags: <a href="http://blog.melroch.se/topic/alternate-history/" title="Alternate history" rel="tag">Alternate history</a>, <a href="http://blog.melroch.se/tag/languages/" title="Languages" rel="tag">Languages</a>, <a href="http://blog.melroch.se/topic/opinions/" title="Opinions" rel="tag">Opinions</a>, <a href="http://blog.melroch.se/tag/philology/" title="philology" rel="tag">philology</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://blog.melroch.se/conlanging/rhodrese-articles-and-indefinite-pronouns/" title="Rhodrese articles and indefinite pronouns (27 March, 2009)">Rhodrese articles and indefinite pronouns</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://blog.melroch.se/alternate-history/mundus-germaniae-romanae/mgr-northern-romance/" title="MGR-Northern Romance (30 January, 2008)">MGR-Northern Romance</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.melroch.se/alternate-history/re-romconlang-northern-romance-chronology-and-phonology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

